Progress syntax changed v2 to v3?
Paul E. Jones
paul.jones at TIES.ITU.INT
Thu Mar 2 01:19:07 EST 2000
Paul,
The H.323v3 text is correct. The extension marker was misplaced in the
published H.225v2 document and was corrected in the H.323 Implementers Guide
in September 1998.
Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Long" <plong at SMITHMICRO.COM>
To: <ITU-SG16 at mailbag.cps.intel.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2000 11:20 AM
Subject: Progress syntax changed v2 to v3?
> It looks like the syntax for Progress changed between H.225.0v2 and v3.
> Seems like this would present some rather basic interoperability problems.
> Do I simply have the wrong syntax for v3?
>
> This is the syntax for Progress in the published H.225.0v2 Recommendation
> from the ITU:
>
> Progress-UUIE ::= SEQUENCE
> {
> protocolIdentifier ProtocolIdentifier,
> destinationInfo EndpointType,
> h245Address TransportAddress OPTIONAL,
> callIdentifier CallIdentifier,
> h245SecurityMode H245Security OPTIONAL,
> ...,
> tokens SEQUENCE OF ClearToken
OPTIONAL,
> cryptoTokens SEQUENCE OF CryptoH323Token
OPTIONAL,
> fastStart SEQUENCE OF OCTET STRING
OPTIONAL,
> }
>
> ...and this is the syntax for the same type in v3:
>
> Progress-UUIE ::= SEQUENCE
> {
> protocolIdentifier ProtocolIdentifier,
> destinationInfo EndpointType,
> h245Address TransportAddress OPTIONAL,
> callIdentifier CallIdentifier,
> h245SecurityMode H245Security OPTIONAL,
> tokens SEQUENCE OF ClearToken OPTIONAL,
> cryptoTokens SEQUENCE OF CryptoH323Token
OPTIONAL,
> fastStart SEQUENCE OF OCTET STRING OPTIONAL,
> ...,
> multipleCalls BOOLEAN,
> maintainConnection BOOLEAN
> }
>
> Paul Long
> Smith Micro Software, Inc.
>
More information about the sg16-avd
mailing list