Doubt about CallLinkage structure in IRR message

Paul E. Jones paul.jones at TIES.ITU.INT
Tue Mar 21 21:22:40 EST 2000


Aseem,

That is definitely a typographical error-- the callLinkage field should
definitely contain the OPTIONAL modifier.  I will make a correction to this
and make mention of it at the next Question 13/16 meeting.

Thanks for pointing that out.

Best Regards,
Paul

----- Original Message -----
From: "Aseem Agarwal" <aseem at trillium.com>
To: <paul.jones at ties.itu.int>
Cc: <h323implementors at imtc.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 7:15 PM
Subject: Doubt about CallLinkage structure in IRR message


> Hi Paul,
>   Implementers' Guide for H.225V3 (H323V3_IG_0002.zip) has added
>   CallLinkage structure to perCallInfo in IRR as a mandatory IE.
>
>   Since the Call Linkage is an optional feature, it should be an
>   optional IE. Is this a mistake or there is a reason behind it?
>   Kindly clarify.
>
> thanks,
> aseem at trillium.com
>
>



More information about the sg16-avd mailing list