On TD26 - Fast TCS and M/S negotiation in H.323v4

Callaghan, Robert Robert.Callaghan at icn.siemens.com
Tue Jun 6 11:12:07 EDT 2000


Paul,

I was afraid that this might happen.

The changes under discussion were agreed to in Osaka, with the participants
understanding the risks.  To not include it in v4 would be a substantive
change from the agreed content which I challenge as being beyond the
discression of the editor to make editorial changes.

There is a real problem in that keypad information must be sent before the
connect message.  This is needed to support network services in the U.S.
Because the H.245 rules require the exchange of TSC and master-slave before
any other messages may be sent, there is a significate delay after fast
connect before keypad digits may be sent.  In Osaka, several proposal were
submitted to solve this and other needed negotiation problems.  The agreed
solution was the proposal for which you have reservations.  This is needed
in the real world.

PLEASE! find a solutions that will not remove these changes!

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul E. Jones [mailto:paulej at PACKETIZER.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 11:14 PM
To: ITU-SG16 at mailbag.cps.intel.com
Subject: Re: On TD26 - Fast TCS and M/S negotiation in H.323v4


Paul,

We agreed at the Osaka meeting to allow a SETUP to contain both the
fastStart and h245Control, but it has not been officially approved by the
ITU.

As it stands right now, I don't think I can agree to include it in H.323v4
on the grounds that it breaks backward compatibility with V2-- I just don't
see a clean solution here.

I'm opening to hearing more suggestions, but as you pointed out, there are
two issues:
  1) H.323v2 states explicitly that it is illegal
  2) There is no way to know what version to destination EP is before
     sending this illegal message

Paul

----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Long" <Plong at SMITHMICRO.COM>
To: <ITU-SG16 at mailbag.cps.intel.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 10:34 AM
Subject: Re: On TD26 - Fast TCS and M/S negotiation in H.323v4


> Pete,
>
> Table 13/H.225.0v3 shows that the User-to-User IE is mandatory. What IEs
do
> you believe are not mandatory?
>
> H.323 states that the fastStart and h245Control components cannot both be
> present in the Setup message (do I need to quote it again?). A Setup
> User-to-User IE containing either or neither component is valid; one
> containing both is clearly invalid. Why do you think otherwise?
>
> H.323, by way of Q.931, requires that the called EP respond with
> ReleaseComplete with cause 100. There is no other appropriate cause.
>
> The feature that should be deprecated is the inclusion of both fastStart
and
> h245Control in Setup. I was under the impression that either through IGv3
or
> H.323v4 this had already made it into the standard. If its not too late,
we
> should simply remove this feature from any proposed text; if it is too
late,
> we should deprecate it because it causes insurmountable backward
> compatibility problems.
>
> Paul
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pete Cordell [mailto:pete at TECH-KNOW-WARE.COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 4:31 AM
> To: ITU-SG16 at MAILBAG.INTEL.COM
> Subject: Re: On TD26 - Fast TCS and M/S negotiation in H.323v4
>
>
> Paul,
>
> I don't really believe that the release cause you cite is valid.  The
> IEs
> are not mandatory, and (taken by themselves) they don't have invalid
> content.  I don't believe it is the intent of this cause code to signal
> the
> sort of thing that we are talking about here either.
>
> Are there any other causes and clauses that you think might be more
> appropriate?
>
> Also, when you say "the feature" should be deprecated, what are you
> referring to as "the feature"?  I'm not quite clear.
>
> Pete.
>
> =============================================
> Pete Cordell
> pete at tech-know-ware.com
> =============================================
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
> listserv at mailbag.intel.com
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
listserv at mailbag.intel.com



More information about the sg16-avd mailing list