Reference which version of Q.931, etc.?

Francois Audet audet at NORTELNETWORKS.COM
Thu Jul 6 14:11:40 EDT 2000

I would agree that it should be the 1998 version (not that it matters since
we are not using Q.931 in the first place, but our own "interpretation" of

Are we even allowed to refer to "superceded" versions of a Recommendation?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Callaghan, Robert [mailto:Robert.Callaghan at ICN.SIEMENS.COM]
> Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2000 5:11 AM
> Subject: Re: Reference which version of Q.931, etc.?
> Rich,
> I guess that I misunderstood what you were saying.  I agree that your
> proposed solution is the only practical one at this time.
> As to Q.932, etc.  I think that it would be best to keep all
> references to
> the versions in v2 for the same reason as for Q.931.
> Bob
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Robert Callaghan
> Siemens Enterprise Networks
> Tel: +1.561.923.1756    Fax: +1.561.923.1403
> Email:  Robert.Callaghan at
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the sg16-avd mailing list