Comments on H.225v4 and H.323v4

[Paul E. Jones]

Morgan,

> H.323 /p75: The change of name from 'package' to 'parameter' is
> inappropriate.
> If the name has to be changed from 'package', it should be changed to
> genericFeature.

I proposed this change, because the word "package" conflicted with H.248
"packages" and I thought that it was too confusing.  GenericParameter seemed
like a reasonable  name.  I don't like the idea of calling it a "generic
feature", because the structures in themselves are not "features".  One uses
the "generic parameter" structures in order to implement "features".

How about "generic fields" or "generic elements"?  I still prefer "generic
parameter" over those.

Paul

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
listserv at mailbag.intel.com