H.323-SIP Discussion

Joon Maeng joon_maeng at vtel.com
Thu Feb 24 08:57:24 EST 2000


I second what Bahman said.  It should be H.323-SIP or SIP-H.323
Interworking.  Cheers.
Regards,
Joon

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Bahman Mobasser [mailto:bahman at bahman.org]
> Sent:	Wednesday, February 23, 2000 10:50 PM
> To:	Orit Levin; Tom-PT Taylor; martinze at cig.mot.com; 
> ranga.dendi at wcom.com; joon_maeng at vtel.com; Francois Audet; 
> Dave Walker; Paul E. Jones; Henning Schulzrinne; Roy, Radhika 
> R, ALARC; Stephen Terrill; bahman.mobasser at alcatel.fr; 
> jo at teles.com; Joerg Ott
> Subject:	RE: H.323-SIP Discussion
> 
> I find the title H.323-Internet a bit disconcerting. Wasn't 
> H.323 usable on Internet up to now? The title seems to 
> suggest H.323 on Internet is something new!
> 
> I know it is just a title, but I prefer simply H.323-SIP.
> 
> Bahman
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Bahman Mobasser                   Tel: +33 1 30771608
> Alcatel                        Mobile: +33 6 12091822
> 10 rue Latécoère                  Fax: +33 1 30779914
> 78140 Vélizy        Voice & Fax Mail: +33 1 5301 0789
> France               Roaming email: Bahman at Bahman.org
> -----------------------------------------------------
> 
>  << OLE Object: Ensemble OLE >> 
> 
	> -----Original Message-----
	> From:	Orit Levin [mailto:orit at radvision.com]
	> Sent:	jeudi 24 février 2000 01:51
	> To:	Tom-PT Taylor; martinze at cig.mot.com; 
	> ranga.dendi at wcom.com; joon_maeng at vtel.com; Francois Audet; 
	> Dave Walker; Paul E. Jones; Henning Schulzrinne; Roy, Radhika 
	> R, ALARC; Stephen Terrill; bahman.mobasser at alcatel.fr; 
	> jo at teles.com; Joerg Ott
	> Subject:	Re: H.323-SIP Discussion
	> 
	> Hello all!
	> I enjoyed to see a positive discussion this morning.
	> Therefore I would like to move the topic to the SG-16 mailing list
and
	> indicate it by [H.323-Internet] topic.
	> François, any ideas for an alternative name? "SIP" is 
	> limiting, "IETF" is
	> political...
	> 
	> Joon, I think that a "scope" chapter is a good idea. I 
	> completely agree that
	> before diving into details of our contributions, we have to 
	> formulate this
	> part. On the other hand, I see it as an output of our initial 
	> discussion,
	> rather then its starting point. If you already have in mind 
	> some specifics
	> on the scope chapter, go ahead and put them on the (mailing)
paper.
	> 
	> In regards to starting a formal joined work with IETF and 
	> pushing for a
	> working group.  It is a sensitive issue (Are we in agreement on
that?)
	> Everybody (as a company and as an individual) is free to 
	> join, initiate or
	> participate in various standards bodies and pursue their goals.
These
	> initiatives can be helpful for our work as well. I wouldn't 
	> start our ITU
	> work from formal definition of relationships with other 
	> standards bodies. As
	> we can see from Henning's mail, the good will from all of us 
	> is a great
	> starting point!
	> I am afraid that not all of us will go to Australia. My 
	> company (as many
	> others) will have representatives in SIP, Megaco and other 
	> relevant working
	> groups.  Nevertheless lets start the official H.323-Internet 
	> work at ITU.
	> I hope to see more specific topics of interest and "a will" 
	> to address them
	> in contributions for Osaka meeting. I will incorporate 
	> François' additions.
	> Stephen, could you list IETF latest topics, list of services 
	> and level of
	> scenarios that you would like to consider as a part of this work.
	>  I wouldn't like to address the same things as TIPHON and 
	> IETF do. They are
	> doing very well and we may help them if needed. All of us 
	> have different
	> interests, but my personal opinion is that
	> - providing end user with end-to-end basic++ connectivity
	> - enhancing H.323 by using IETF technologies (which 
	> definitely helps the
	> first one)
	> - finding common areas of interest among the companies
	> are the criteria for defining our work items.
	> BTW: Conference call is good, but lets do some work at home and on
the
	> mailing list before we have an agenda to discuss.
	> Best Regards,
	> Orit Levin
	> RADVision Inc.
	> 575 Corporate Drive Suite 420
	> Mahwah, NJ 07430
	> Tel: 1 201 529 4300  (230)
	> Fax: 1 201 529 3516
	> www.radvision.com
	> orit at radvision.com



More information about the sg16-avd mailing list