H.323-SIP Discussion
Roy, Radhika R, ALARC
rrroy at att.com
Wed Feb 23 08:24:22 EST 2000
Hi, Steve and All:
I am enclosing the draft that Orit sends to us. Also, I guess that Joon will
proceed for requesting BOF in the IETF for this work. Please send an email
like Steve to all of us regarding the date, time, and agenda of the meeting.
I am also delighted to see Frank Audet's comments. Let all of us comment on
the document.
Best regards,
Radhika
<<H323-Internet_RADvision.doc>>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Terrill [SMTP:stephen.terrill at ericsson.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2000 6:30 AM
> To: Roy, Radhika R, ALARC
> Cc: Orit Levin; Tom-PT Taylor; martinze at cig.mot.com;
> ranga.dendi at wcom.com; joon_maeng at vtel.com; Francois Audet; Dave Walker;
> Paul E. Jones; schulzrinne at cs.columbia.edu; bahman.mobasser at alcatel.fr;
> jo at teles.com
> Subject: Re: H.323-SIP Discussion
>
> Hi Roy,
>
> Hi Roy,
>
> The 3/1 or 3/2 would be best, and the time is OK (17 - 19 C european
> time).
>
> I would like to see the proposed agenda, and I would like to see that it
> coveres the latest in the IETF thoughts as well. I think that it is
> benificial if we can agree on the network scenarios which we are to
> concentrate on, and the service set.
>
> Thanks,
>
> ..//Steve
>
> "Roy, Radhika R, ALARC" wrote:
>
> > Hi, Orit and Joon:
> >
> > I am glad that we got the views of Joon. We all had long conversations
> > before, during, and after the SG16 meeting.
> >
> > If needed, we may also arrange a conference call among ourselves.
> Propose
> > time can be 11 AM - 1 PM EST USA and probable dates are 2/24, 3/1, 3/2,
> > 3/3. I will arrange the conf bridge if we all agree to have a conf call.
> Pl.
> > let me know.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Radhika
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Joon Maeng [SMTP:joon_maeng at vtel.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 5:13 PM
> > To: 'Orit Levin'; Tom-PT Taylor; Roy, Radhika R, ALARC;
> > martinze at cig.mot.com; ranga.dendi at wcom.com; Francois Audet; Dave Walker;
> > Paul E. Jones
> > Subject: RE: H.323-SIP Discussion
> >
> > Hi Orit. You document seems to be a very good starting point. Before we
> > start making any comments to your document, I'd like to see if we can
> agree
> > on what we are going to work on. I am talking about defining the scope
> based
> > on the requirements. I am sure my interest is different form others.
> Can we
> > insert the scope section in you document and discuss what we are going
> to
> > work on (in the first phase and so on..) before we get into details?
> The
> > scope will help us in building the consensus quickly. Cheers.
> > Regards,
> > Joon
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Roy, Radhika R, ALARC
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 5:00 PM
> > > To: 'Orit Levin'; Tom-PT Taylor; martinze at cig.mot.com;
> > > ranga.dendi at wcom.com; joon_maeng at vtel.com; Francois Audet; Dave
> Walker;
> > > Paul E. Jones; 'schulzrinne at cs.columbia.edu';
> > > 'bahman.mobasser at alcatel.fr'; 'stephen.terrill at ericsson.com';
> > > 'jo at teles.com'
> > > Subject: RE: H.323-SIP Discussion
> > >
> > > Hi, Orit:
> > >
> > > You are just right on time. I appreciate this.
> > >
> > > Please provide me couple of days (may be 2 more days). I would also
> like
> > > to include Henning S., Bahman M, Stephen T. and others in this mail.
> > >
> > > My understanding is that you are willing to work as an editor of this
> work
> > > in the SG16.
> > >
> > > Henning, just to let you know that SG16 has taken this as a work item.
> > >
> > > Going forward, we would also like to take this issue to the IETF to
> open a
> > > work item there as well. Tom indicated that Scott B. likes to see that
> > > there is enough support for this work item in the IETF before he
> considers
> > > whether it is worthwhile to open a new WG or to be a part of another
> WG.
> > > Tom might elaborate on this.
> > >
> > > I plan to attend the next IETF meeting in March'00. If we all plan to
> go
> > > there, we may push for this work in the IETF as well.
> > >
> > > I would request that all of us provide comments on this. If needed, we
> all
> > > may be the co-author of this document to show that we have a wide
> support
> > > for this paper.
> > >
> > > By the way, the next Q.13-14/16 Rapporteur meeting to be held in
> OSAKA,
> > > Japan (May 15-19) and any company can be the co-author of this
> document
> > > irrespective of the country of origin. Even Henning can also join in
> this
> > > contribution although Columbia University is not a member of the ITU-T
> > > because a Rap. can allow anyone to participate in the meeting.
> > >
> > > Let us start this with a great cooperative mode.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Radhika R. Roy
> > > AT&T
> > > +1 732 420 1580
> > > rrroy at att.com
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Orit Levin [SMTP:orit at radvision.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 4:17 PM
> > > To: Tom-PT Taylor; Roy, Radhika R, ALARC;
> martinze at cig.mot.com;
> > > ranga.dendi at wcom.com; joon_maeng at vtel.com; Francois Audet; Dave
> Walker;
> > > Paul E. Jones
> > > Subject: H.323-SIP Discusssion
> > >
> > > Hello all!
> > > I put together the ideas for H.323-Internet Interworking
> > > discussion/work as the first follow up from Geneva meeting. Please,
> look
> > > into it, comment, provide ideas and additional topics of your
> interest.
> > > Feel free to forward it to whom I forgot... The only reason, I am NOT
> > > putting this on the SG16 mailing list, I wouldn't like to create waves
> > > outside H.323 community before we have an understanding on the agenda
> in
> > > general. After the first round of remarks, I would like to send it to
> SG16
> > > mailing list.
> > > Regards,
> > > Orit Levin
> > > RADVision Inc.
> > > 575 Corporate Drive Suite 420
> > > Mahwah, NJ 07430
> > > Tel: 1 201 529 4300 (230)
> > > Fax: 1 201 529 3516
> > > www.radvision.com <http://www.radvision.com>
> > > orit at radvision.com <mailto:orit at radvision.com> << File:
> > > H323-Internet.zip >>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: H323-Internet_RADvision.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 59904 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.packetizer.com/pipermail/sg16-avd/attachments/20000223/ba77e153/attachment-0006.doc>
More information about the sg16-avd
mailing list