Nit on new callcapacity field

Rich Bowen rkbowen at CISCO.COM
Fri Feb 25 15:24:49 EST 2000


Dave,

Good catch - obviously a digit is missing, so I'll fix this in
the next draft.  And of course we don't want to place unreasonable
limits on SETs!

Rich
--
Dave Walker wrote:
>
> Can anyone explain the mysterious maximum value used for all
> of the call capacity fields added to H.225.0 version 4?
> They are all defined as INTEGER (1..429467295).  At first
> glance, it appeared to be 4G (which is BIG!), but after a while,
> it revealed itself to be something totally different (429M,
> still a fair sized H323 endpoint).  I'd like this to be fixed.
> (I find it an unreasonable limitation on my Annex L endpoint ;)
>
> Dave W.

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard K. Bowen                       Cisco Systems, Inc.
rkbowen at cisco.com                      Research Triangle Park, NC
--------------------------------------------------------------------



More information about the sg16-avd mailing list