Nit on new callcapacity field
Rich Bowen
rkbowen at CISCO.COM
Fri Feb 25 15:24:49 EST 2000
Dave,
Good catch - obviously a digit is missing, so I'll fix this in
the next draft. And of course we don't want to place unreasonable
limits on SETs!
Rich
--
Dave Walker wrote:
>
> Can anyone explain the mysterious maximum value used for all
> of the call capacity fields added to H.225.0 version 4?
> They are all defined as INTEGER (1..429467295). At first
> glance, it appeared to be 4G (which is BIG!), but after a while,
> it revealed itself to be something totally different (429M,
> still a fair sized H323 endpoint). I'd like this to be fixed.
> (I find it an unreasonable limitation on my Annex L endpoint ;)
>
> Dave W.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard K. Bowen Cisco Systems, Inc.
rkbowen at cisco.com Research Triangle Park, NC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the sg16-avd
mailing list