H.323 Annex N draft

[Roy, Radhika R, ALARC]

Hi, Audet:

Yes, I agree.

We should take the high level generic table (provided in the last meeting)
as a starting point. Now we have to work around such that the parameters
expressed in the table can be used to map over the lower network layer in a
meaningful way to prove that it works to provide the backward compatibility
as a minimum before we go any further.

This is definitely a test how good it is to satisfy the requirements.

Therefore, we should include "mapping" of the H.323 QOS to the lower network
layer in the "scope."

Best regards,
Radhika R. Roy
AT&T

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Francois Audet [SMTP:audet at NORTELNETWORKS.COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 2:36 PM
> To:   ITU-SG16 at MAILBAG.INTEL.COM
> Subject:      Re: H.323 Annex N draft
>
> In any case, we now have a baseline text.
> Contributions are welcomed for the next meeting.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Roy, Radhika R, ALARC [ <mailto:rrroy at ATT.COM>]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 11:31 AM
> > To: ITU-SG16 at MAILBAG.INTEL.COM
> > Subject: Re: H.323 Annex N draft
> >
> >
> > Hi, Mike:
> >
> > The fundamental issue is that we should be able to map the
> > H.323 QOS over
> > the lower network layer.
> >
>