URGENT question on draft-ietf-avt-tones-07
Stephen Casner
casner at CISCO.COM
Fri Feb 11 16:40:17 EST 2000
Hello Jane,
>>>>> "Jane" == Jane Hua <huajane at YAHOO.COM> writes:
Jane> So let me ask Frank's question this way:
Jane> If a E.164 address is assigned and I want to unregister only
Jane> few of my Call Signalling addresses, do I have to unregister
Jane> my E.164(assigned one) also?
1. This question is not relevant to my interpretation of the
recommendation paragraph quoted by Frank.
2. I believe registration of multiple EPs using the same terminalAlias
(or prefix in case of gateways) is outside of the scope of the
recommendation. So what to do in this case depends on the
implementation of the GK.
3. URQ contains this:
endpointAlias SEQUENCE OF AliasAddress OPTIONAL,
So I do not see a single reason why indicating E.164 would be
required in your case.
A+.
--
Francois-Xavier KOWALSKI __________ Telecom Engineer
Hewlett-Packard Company //_ o \\/ Telecom Infrastructure Division
Tel:+33 (0) 4 76 14 63 27 // // /\\ Fax:+33 (0) 4 76 14 16 86
mailto:fxk at tidweb.grenoble.hp.com http://www.hp.com/go/opencall/
More information about the sg16-avd
mailing list