22th and 23th are also fine with me...
- Jaakko
-----Original Message-----
From: EXT Gösta Linder (LME)
[mailto:Gosta.Linder at LME.ERICSSON.SE]
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2000 10:00 AM
To: ITU-SG16 at mailbag.cps.intel.com
Subject: Re: [H.323Mobility:]
Paul,
22 and 23 are fine with me/Gösta
-----Original Message-----
From: Guram Paul-LPG019 [mailto:lpg019 at EMAIL.MOT.COM]
Sent: den 24 februari 2000 01:16
To: ITU-SG16 at mailbag.cps.intel.com
Subject: Re: [H.323Mobility:]
Hi ad hoc Mob. Group
1. We will continue, as previously, and use the URL
(ftp://standard.pictel.com/avc-site/Mobility-adhoc/ ) which
has been
allocated for our group's use. New contributions to start
as (Mobility
document) MDs to distinguish from the old numerous numbering
schemes (for
MTD,e.g. mtd03, mtd 201, etc.). I suggest we start at md010
as the first
contribution with md001 to md009 to be used for management
activities (to be
defined later). When contributing, look at the ftp site for
the next number
available, reserve it by announcing to group, then (if no
conflict of
numbers) load it onto the site. OR we could ask one of Paul
(R or G), Roy,
or for Jaakko to control the allocation of the numbers, if
you think that
would be a better way which avoids clash of same number
being used.
2. Jaakko has sent us the zipped file with the TD129
from Geneva for
Annex H. This is the document Jaakko will work on as the
base-line document
and Jaakko, could this be put onto the ftp site as Annex H
version 03
(version 01 being Red Bank output, version 2 being ad hoc
group input into
Geneva, and version 3 being Geneva output). Following on
from Nicolas
Tran's comments, there are already (minor) changes to be
made to version 3,
and this will be done as part of regular editor update.
Similarly for the
ToR document. Is that acceptable ?
3. Apart from Radhika, I have not received availability
information for
our next conf. call from anyone else. Please let me know
which dates are
most suitable from 20-24 March to enable me to arrange for
an appropriate
date.
Regards
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: Roy, Radhika R, ALARC
[mailto:rrroy at att.com]
Sent: 23 February 2000 15:58
To: ITU-SG16 at mailbag.cps.intel.com
Subject: Re: [H.323Mobility:]
Hi, Paul and Jaakko:
Many thanks for the information.
Paul Guram: Please provide a well thought
convention for the
document
number. For example, MTD.xxx would be given
to diiferentiate
from the
reqular TDs. One request to you: Once a
numbering convention
is used, please
try to stick to that rule (if we change the
rule in the
middle, it creates
confusions as it happened last time).
Best regards,
Radhika R. Roy
AT&T
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaakko Sundquist
[SMTP:jaakko.sundquist at NOKIA.COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2000 9:01 AM
> To: ITU-SG16 at MAILBAG.INTEL.COM
> Subject: Re: [H.323Mobility:]
>
> Hi Radhika et al,
>
> There seems to be a subdirectory in the
pictel-site for
mobility. The URL
> is:
ftp://standard.pictel.com/avc-site/Mobility-adhoc/ . I
suggest that we
> will put our contributions there. It would
be nice to have
some naming
> convention (such as the MTD-xxx scheme)
for the documents.
Maybe Paul
> should
> assign these numbers as he is now the
moderator for the
teleconferences...
>
> - Jaakko Sundquist
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: EXT Roy, Radhika
R, ALARC
[mailto:rrroy at att.com]
> Sent: Wednesday,
February 23, 2000 3:34
PM
> To:
ITU-SG16 at mailbag.cps.intel.com
> Subject: Re:
[H.323Mobility:]
>
> Hi, Jaakko:
>
> I agree with your reply
that was also
reflected in my
> earlier email.
>
> I have a question to you
and Paul Guram:
Have you guys
> decided where the
> incoming contributions for
the Ad Hoc
group to be sent and
> where the URL
> would be for accessing to
that website? If
it is so,
> please
> let all of us
> know soon.
>
> Paul Guram: Are you close
to decide the
meeting date and
> time as well?
>
> Best regards,
> Radhika R. Roy
>
>
> > -----Original
Message-----
> > From: Jaakko Sundquist
[SMTP:jaakko.sundquist at NOKIA.COM]
> > Sent: Wednesday,
February 23, 2000 3:37
AM
> > To:
ITU-SG16 at MAILBAG.INTEL.COM
> > Subject:
[H.323Mobility:]
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm sending here the
documents related
to H.323 Annex H
> that were
> > accomplished in the
Geneva meeting by
the ad hoc
> mobility
> group. Included
> > are the draft Annex H,
the Terms of
Reference for it as
> well as the
> > meeting
> > minutes (quite short) of
the ad hoc
group meetings in
> Geneva.
> >
> > As Mr. Tran pointed out
the location
area had been left
> to
> the VLF-section
> > of the draft annex. This
is my mistake
and I apologize
> for
> any confusion
> > it
> > has created. I did not,
however, take it
off from the
> document I am
> > sending
> > here, this is the
document that was
produced as a TD in
> Geneva, but I will
> > remove the location area
from the
subsequent versions of
> the draft annex.
> > As for the TMSI, etc.
concepts, in my
view it is quite
> unnecessary to
> > argue
> > about these, the TMSI is
already
included in the
> proposed
> new alias
> > address
> > type: UIM. Many of these
concepts are,
as I understand,
> already needed in
> > H.246 Annex E, which
addresses one
scenario of the
> mobility problem. I
> > would
> > see the VLR
functionality of the H.246
Annex E IWF as
> really the VLF we
> > have
> > defined as a new
mobility functional
entity, thus the
> identifiers TMSI,
> > etc.
> > would be needed in the
VLF at least in
some cases.
> However, it might be
> > suitable to indicate
that all of the
identifiers
> mentioned
> in the VLF (and
> > other) section(s) are
not mandatory.
> >
> > <<GenevaMobility.zip>>
> >
> > - Jaakko Sundquist
> >
-------------------------------------------------------
> > In a hole in the
ground there lived
a hobbit.
> > Not a nasty, dirty, wet
hole, filled
with the ends of
> > worms and an oozy
smell, nor yet a
dry, bare,
> > sandy hole with nothing
in it to sit
down on or to eat:
> > it was a
hobbit-hole, and that
means comfort.
> >
-------------------------------------------------------
> <<
> File:
> > GenevaMobility.zip >>