Fast Connect & Bi Directional channels
Paul E. Jones
paulej at PACKETIZER.COM
Sun Dec 17 22:33:37 EST 2000
Agreed. I have changed the text accordingly.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Long" <plong at PACKETIZER.COM>
To: <ITU-SG16 at mailbag.cps.intel.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2000 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: Fast Connect & Bi Directional channels
> To be perfectly clear, I recommend inserting the text below into the new
> sentence you added to 188.8.131.52.
> "The ***called*** endpoint shall use the proposed logical channel number
> the forwardlogicalChannelNumber element as the logical channel number of
> ***forward and*** reverse channel."
> Paul Long
> ipDialog, Inc.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul E. Jones [mailto:paulej at PACKETIZER.COM]
> Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2000 1:48 AM
> To: ITU-SG16 at MAILBAG.INTEL.COM
> Subject: Re: Fast Connect & Bi Directional channels
> Sasha, et al.,
> Sorry for the last e-mail on this subject. I had not seen this one, yet.
> So, it appears that you agree that for bi-directional channels we can use
> the forward LCN as the value of the reverse LCN. I have attached the most
> recent documents containing corrections to H.323v4 and H.225.0v4, which
> includes a proposal for this item.
> Please review the text and give me comments.
> Best Regards,
> For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
> listserv at mailbag.intel.com
For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
listserv at mailbag.intel.com
More information about the sg16-avd