Q12-14/16 Rapporteur meeting after Osaka

[Sakae OKUBO]

Vineet:

I am just pointing out about only one point of yours: "H.323 already has
mechanisms for discovering the gatekeeper. "

Yes, it is true: GRQ is the mechanism that is used today in H.323.

The time it was decided to use GRQ for discovering the GK, it was not
envisioned for the highly mobile communications environments like cellular
(wireless) network or a combination of cellular (wireless), wireless LAN,
and/or wire-line network.

The fundamental question is: Does the same GRQ mechanism make sense to use
for the H.323 mobility architecture that we are considering now because of
the heavy traffic generated (and associated problems) by the 100s, 1000s of
mobile users that will access to a cell?

AT&T's contributions MD-017 and MD-018 have addressed this question:
Listening to the MGA (Mobility GK Advertise) message (GRQ message can only
be sent if the MGA message is not received within the certain time
interval).

Like you, I also have the same questions 1, 2, and 3 to Steve.

Best regards,
Radhika

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kumar, Vineet [SMTP:vineet.kumar at INTEL.COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2000 5:17 PM
> To:   ITU-SG16 at MAILBAG.INTEL.COM
> Subject:      [H.323 Mobility:] questions on MTD-016
>
> Stephen,
>
> I have a couple of questions on your contribution MTD-016. These are:
>
> 1. H.323 already has mechanisms for discovering the gatekeeper. Are you
> suggesting in your contribution that the terminal should discover the VLF
> instead of the visiting gatekeeper ? Or, are you assuming that the VLF is
> integrated in the visiting gatekeeper ?
>
> 2. In H.323, authentication of the terminal and the gatekeeper is done at
> the time of discovery. In fact, in H.323 all messages between the terminal
> and the gatekeeper can be authenticated and the message integrity
> preserved. In your contribution, authentication is done at the time of
> registration. Why is this preferable to what is already in H.323 ?
>
> 3. What is the reason for the information flow from the HLF to the home
> gatekeeper, and from the home gatekeeperr to the HLF ? I don't think we
> can assume that there is only one home gatekeeper that the terminal may be
> using. In fact, the home gatekeeper may not have any information about the
> user.
>
> Regards,
> vineet