Mob ad hoc group progress

[Roy, Radhika R, ALARC]

Paul:

Thanks for clarifications.

In the last conf call, we even cannot complete the simple intra-zone
(intra-network, inter-network) scenarios first. You are right that we should
concentrate on the scenarios (Registration procedures, Gatekeeper discovery,
Location update, Call establishment, Mid-Call scenarios (e.g. supplementary
services, user interaction, Call release).

Definitely, we can go further: Inter-Zone (intra-domain) scenarios as well
if we can agree on the first one. AT&T contributions already contain many of
those aspects. Hope to bring new contributions explaining further in both
scenarios.

Best regards,

Radhika R. Roy
AT&T

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guram Paul-LPG019 [SMTP:lpg019 at EMAIL.MOT.COM]
> Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2000 3:52 PM
> To:   ITU-SG16 at MAILBAG.INTEL.COM
> Subject:      Re: Mob ad hoc group progress
>
> Radhika,
>
> Conf call is for Annex H only as before...nothing has changed...change can
> only take place when the group agrees.  Please do not read into the email
> more than what it says.  I was only trying to highlight, in a high level
> report, the plight of Annex I since nothing much has moved in it, and it
> is
> an Annex which together with Annex H covers the mobility aspects.  As far
> as
> Annex E is concerned, the point was that the  mapping was the work of one
> individual or one company, thus could have errors or omissions (more than
> likely)...again only highlighting to people to check out this mapping.
>
> Contributions for next conf call to be for All H.323 intra-network
> scenario
> for:
>                 Registration procedures, Gatekeeper discovery, Location
>                 update, Call establishment, Mid-Call scenarios (e.g.
> supplementary services,
>                 user interaction), Call release.  Also contributions on
> any
> impacts on the already specified architecture in the light of the present
> work are welcome.
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>                 -----Original Message-----
>                 From:   Roy, Radhika R, ALARC [mailto:rrroy at ATT.COM]
>                 Sent:   01 April 2000 00:00
>                 To:     ITU-SG16 at mailbag.cps.intel.com
>                 Subject:        Re: Mob ad hoc group progress
>
>                 Hi, Paul and Mobility Group:
>
>                 I like to see that it should be clarified via emails
> whether
> H.323 Annex I
>                 and H.246 Annex E will be a part of the conference call.
> My
> personal
>                 preference is not to discuss annexes I and E during the
> conference call
>                 although email discussions will be preferred.
>
>                 If Annex I and E are included in the conference call, I
> like
> to see the
>                 actual time in the agenda when these items will be
> discussed
> so that people
>                 can best use their time in joining the particular time
> slot
> for each Annex.
>
>                 The proposal is as follows:
>
>                 1. The upcoming conference call to be dedicated for H.323
> Annex H.
>                 2. Let both editors of H.323 Annex I and H.246 Annex E
> propose via emails
>                 whether any issues to addressed.
>                 3. If annex I and E are included in the agenda of the
> upcoming conference
>                 call, I like to the time slots when these annexes will be
> discussed so that
>                 people can join the particular time slots of interest.
> Alternatively,
>                 separate conference calls can be arranged for annexes I
> and
> E.
>                 4. Are editors or any members of the mobility group sure
> what would be the
>                 scope of work (I guess that Annex E is stable for now -
> thanks to the
>                 editor) for those annexes?
>
>                 Paul: Would you please clarify what specific area that we
> need to discuss
>                 for the next conference call for H.323 Annex H? My guess
> is
> that we may
>                 start with intra-zone communication first. I am planning
> to
> bring
>                 contribution(s) describing this for mobility management:
> Discovery,
>                 Registration, Location Updates, and Call Establishment.
>
>                 I would appreciate comments form all members.
>
>                 Best regards,
>
>                 Radhika R. Roy
>                 AT&T
>                 H.323 Ad Hoc Mobility Group
>