H.323 Annex I
Roy, Radhika R, ALARC
rrroy at ATT.COM
Tue Nov 23 19:55:17 EST 1999
Paul,
I agree. I'll add that to my growing list of issues to address at the next
meeting.
Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Long <plong at SMITHMICRO.COM>
To: <ITU-SG16 at mailbag.cps.intel.com>
Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 1:34 PM
Subject: Re: Problem in Connect Message in H.2250 V3
> Paul and Aseem,
>
> To reduce ambiguity, rather than defining the order in H.225.0, let's
> clearly state in H.225.0 that the encoding order is defined in Q.931. The
> former would, IMO, lead to more confusion because an order would be
defined
> in two places.
>
> Paul Long
> Smith Micro Software, Inc.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aseem Agarwal [mailto:aseem at TRILLIUM.COM]
> Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 12:36 PM
> To: ITU-SG16 at MAILBAG.INTEL.COM
> Subject: Re: Problem in Connect Message in H.2250 V3
>
>
> I feel that this definitely warrants a change in the next Implementor's
> Guide in order to avoid any ambiguity.
>
> aseem
>
More information about the sg16-avd
mailing list