H.323 Mobility: post meeting

Edgar Martinez [1] martinze at CIG.MOT.COM
Thu Nov 18 12:47:50 EST 1999


  unsubscibe

-----Original Message-----
From: Guntram Diehl [mailto:gdiehl at INNOVAPHONE.COM]
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 1999 12:55 AM
To: ITU-SG16 at MAILBAG.INTEL.COM
Subject: Re: Problem in Connect Message in H.2250 V3


Hi,
I would say the table does not indicate a order of the IEs. The order of
the IEs within the message is determined by the code value.
Guntram

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aseem Agarwal [mailto:aseem at trillium.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 1999 11:44 PM
> To: h323implementors at imtc.org
> Cc: ITU-SG16 at mailbag.cps.intel.com
> Subject: Problem in Connect Message in H.2250 V3
>
>
> Hi All
>
>  There is a problem in the additions made to Q.931 part of Connect
>  message in H.2250V3. Two new IEs have been added AFTER
> User-to-User IE.
>
>  The IE codes for the new IEs added are:
>  Connected Number    : 0x4c
>  Connected Subaddress: 0x4d
>
>  The IE code for User-to-User is 0x7e
>
>  According to Q.931 coding Rules [section: 4.5.1], the IEs in
> a message
>  should be in ascending order of their respective code
> values. These two
>  IEs should be added after Date/Time IE.
>
>  Comments ?
>
> aseem at trillium.com
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> for list subscription instructions,
> send email to h323implementors-request at imtc.org with text "info"
>
>



More information about the sg16-avd mailing list