H.245 and MGs
Dale L. Skran
dskran at ASCEND.COM
Tue Mar 9 20:18:50 EST 1999
At 05:14 PM 3/9/99 -0500, you wrote:
>I forwarded a note from David Oran to this list yesterday, presenting a
>number of arguments against placing H.245 with the MG function. I should
>have explained the significance of this message. If his arguments are not
>rebutted, Megaco will place a very low priority on protocol design to
>accommodate any "remoted H.245" arrangement.
>E-mail: taylor at nortelnetworks.com (internally Tom-PT Taylor)
>Tel.: +1 613 736 0961 (internally 396-1490) ***NOTE CHANGE***
>FAX: same number
I trust my response was adequate.
In any case, we must continue to develop on this list H.GCP in such a way
that it meets the needs of those interested in putting H.245 in GWs.
More information about the sg16-avd