H.323v3 for decision in September - Annex G Text
Paul E. Jones
paul.jones at ties.itu.int
Wed Jun 30 07:41:36 EDT 1999
My own preference would be that Annex G would make all appropriate
references to Annex F and not add additional text in the main body of H.323.
I may be mistaken, but I believe that H.323 currently only references Annex
A in the main body of the text to point out a mandatory requirement.
----- Original Message -----
From: Gunnar Hellstrom <gunnar.hellstrom at OMNITOR.SE>
To: <ITU-SG16 at MAILBAG.INTEL.COM>
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 1999 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: H.323v3 for decision in September - Annex G Text
> It might be wise to tie in Annex G Text Conversation and Text SET with a
> few words into the body of H.323 V3.
> Do we have a policy to introduce Annexes with some text in the main body
> can it hang loose as it does now?
> I am not ready with the RTP payload type for text in IETF until later this
> year, and was aiming at a February decision for H.323 V3 with Annex G.
> Gunnar Hellström
> At 20:20 1999-06-28 -0400, Paul E. Jones wrote:
> >We may attempt to decide H.323v3 in September and determine version 4 in
> >February. Mr. Skran has asked that I post the current draft so that
> >can review the document. This document must be delivered to the ITU by
> >June 1999. (Please note that Annex C/H.323 is also a candidate for
> >in Septemer.)
> >This document contains only minor editorial changes to the document that
> >determined in Santiago. Nonetheless, I encourage you to review the
> >for any errors or omissions.
> >The change marks indicate all changes that have been made since version
> >Please direct any comments on the document to me.
> >The document can be found here:
> >Best Regards,
> >Paul E. Jones
> >DataBeam Corporation
> Gunnar Hellstrom
> LM Ericsson
> E-mail gunnar.hellstrom at omnitor.se
> Tel +46 751 100 501
> fax +46 8 556 002 06
More information about the sg16-avd