Summary of Megaco Meeting Results

[Tom-PT Taylor]

Since i received no responses for my question regarding RAS ICV
handling, can i assume that most (if not all) H.323 compliant
implementations do not use RAS ICVs ? It is an optional IE in
all RAS messages.

If anyone knows of implementations using this functionality,
please reply back. Any leads/pointers would be appreciated.

thanks
aseem at trillium.com



Forwarded message:
> From aseem at trillium.com Tue Jul 13 09:48 PDT 1999
> From: aseem at trillium.com (Aseem Agarwal)
> Message-Id: <199907131659.JAA07327 at arathorn.trillium.com.trillium.com>
> Subject: Question on RAS ICV (Integrity Check Value)
> To: h323implementors at imtc.org, ITU-SG16 at mailbag.cps.intel.com
> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 09:59:30 -0700 (PDT)
> Cc: aseem at trillium.com (Aseem Agarwal)
> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> Content-Length: 477
>
> Hi
>    Sometime back there was a thread of discussion on the RAS ICV. I
>    tried to download the previous message digests. But i did not find
>    any decisive mails for future H.323 versions. Can u please tell me
>    how do the present implementations handle ICV generation and ICV
>    verification (at the receiving side) ? I can only think of
>    re-encoding/ decoding the message, which i think shall be a big
>    processing overhead.
>
> Thanks in anticipation,
> aseem at trillium.com
>