Comment on APC-1636 (Was: Documents uploaded)

Hong Liu lhong at RESEARCH.TELCORDIA.COM
Mon Jul 26 14:43:16 EDT 1999


Pete,

We sure have different opinions on how this gets done, and I look forward to
discussing issues with you next week in Berlin. This is exactly the purpose for
submitting this contribution.

Best regards,

--Hong

Pete Cordell wrote:

> Well it seems the Telcordia crowd still haven't read my proposal!!!!!!
>
> What I am proposing is an ASN.1-LIKE specification.  That means similar to,
> but not exactly the same as.  In my proposal your line:
>
> quarenteenProcessing QuarenteenProcessing OPTIONAL
>
> would be represented as:
>
> quarenteenProcessing  AS  q  QuarenteenProcessing OPTIONAL.
>
> and q would be used as the on the wire tag for precisely the reasons quoted
> in APC-1636.
>
> If there are worries that this isn't ASN.1 (if that is worth worrying
> about!), then all you have to do is go through removing any AS specifiers
> either manually or automatically.  It's no big deal.
>
> Pete
>
> =============================================
> Pete Cordell
> pete at tech-know-ware.com
> =============================================
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hong Liu <lhong at RESEARCH.TELCORDIA.COM>
> To: ITU-SG16 at MAILBAG.INTEL.COM <ITU-SG16 at MAILBAG.INTEL.COM>
> Date: 26 July 1999 17:01
> Subject: Documents uploaded
>
> >Hi, all,
> >
> >I have uploaded two contributions from Telcordia Technologies to the ftp
> >incoming directory for the Berlin meeting:
> >
> >APC-1635: Mapping H.245 Semantics to SDP
> >APC-1636: Comparing EBNF and ASN.1 for Text Encoding
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >--Hong
> >



More information about the sg16-avd mailing list