TPKT in H.225.0

[Derks, Frank]

Hi Tom,

I couldn't find it either and I suspect that it couldn't be in because the
ITU is very reluctant to reference any non-ITU material. Furthermore,
RFC1006 encompasses a lot more than just the bit(s) that are used for
H.225.0, so even referring to this RFC does not clarify it all. I think some
work should be spent on this.

Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom-PT Taylor [mailto:taylor at NORTELNETWORKS.COM]
Sent: 02 February 1999 22:12
To: ITU-SG16 at MAILBAG.INTEL.COM
Subject: Re: TPKT in H.225.0


I'd swear the reference to RFC1006 used to be in H.225.0 Appendix D, but I
can't find it there now.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Derks, Frank [SMTP:F.Derks at PBC.BE.PHILIPS.COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 1999 4:05 AM
> To:   ITU-SG16 at MAILBAG.INTEL.COM
> Subject:      Re: TPKT in H.225.0
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> I received two responses to my question, one from you and one from Tom
> Taylor. The fact that there are at least two people that know about it
> (and
> several dozens more that have actually implemented the protocol stacks),
> makes it hard to believe that this is an "oversight" in the
> recommendation.
> In fact, not knowing about this makes it impossible to implement an
> interoperable protocol stack! Shouldn't action be taken to get this into
> the
> recommendation ASAP (e.g. through the Implementor's Guide)?
>
> Regards,
>
> Frank
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Long [mailto:Plong at SMITHMICRO.COM]
> Sent: 01 February 1999 18:50
> To: ITU-SG16 at MAILBAG.INTEL.COM
> Subject: Re: TPKT in H.225.0
>
>
> TPKT is defined in RFC 1006. Not identifying TPKT was an oversight that
> has
> never been fixed in the Recommendation.
>
> Paul Long
> Smith Micro Software, Inc.