e164 vs. partyNumber aliases
rovny at MDIS.RU
Thu Apr 15 05:15:45 EDT 1999
Maybe the idea was as following.
The Endpoint itself may avoid parsing or somehow
handling any prefixes in the dialed number but may
just pass the E164 alias as it is to its Gatekeeper.
The latter may avoid replacing the prefixes with
ones specific to the destination (say) gateway but
may translate the alias into a partyNumber one and
return it in ACF. So E164 is understood as a locally
valid alias, and partyNumber as an alias to be
MD Information Systems
More information about the sg16-avd