e164 vs. partyNumber aliases
Paul Long
Plong at SMITHMICRO.COM
Wed Apr 14 13:56:32 EDT 1999
Okay, but what is the status of the e164 alias? For example, if a user enters
a "telephone number" at a v1 EP, it must be provided as an e164 alias. Will
all other entities continue to recognize this as a telephone number? Now if a
user does the same thing at a v2 EP, can the number be provided as an e164
alias _or_ a partyNumber? Will all entities continue to support both types of
aliases, or is e164 deprecated as of v2? As an EP vendor, I'd really hate to
require the user to indicate whether the number they just entered is an "e164
alias" or a "party number." Yucko... Maybe, just to be safe, the number should
be provided in both forms, but I think some entities get confused when
confronted with multiple aliases, or at least the semantics of such a thing is
ambiguous.
Paul Long
Smith Micro Software, Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: Callaghan, Robert [SMTP:Robert.Callaghan at ICN.SIEMENS.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 1999 12:14 PM
To: ITU-SG16 at MAILBAG.INTEL.COM
Subject: Re: e164 vs. partyNumber aliases
Paul,
The E164 alias, in use, is the user dialed number not a structured
E.164
address. The partyNumber is the structured E.164 or Private Number.
Bob
------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Callaghan
Siemens Information & Communication Networks
Tel: +1.561.997.3756 Fax: +1.561.997.3403
Email: Robert.Callaghan at ICN.Siemens.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Long [mailto:Plong at SMITHMICRO.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 1999 12:38 PM
To: ITU-SG16 at mailbag.cps.intel.com
Subject: e164 vs. partyNumber aliases
What is the difference between an e164 alias and a partyNumber alias?
Was
e164
found lacking, and does partyNumber now supercede it? Are we supposed
to
stop
using e164? If not, how do we decide which form to use?
Paul Long
Smith Micro Software, Inc.
More information about the sg16-avd
mailing list