e164 vs. partyNumber aliases
Santo Wiryaman
swiryaman at VIDEOSERVER.COM
Wed Apr 14 13:13:12 EDT 1999
I like to see e164 alias being used. In order for an EP to send the new V2
aliases, it has to know that the destination is a V2 or higher. How does
the caller know the callee is V2 or higher? Any thoughts?
----------------------------------------
Santo Wiryaman
VideoServer, Inc.
Phone:+1.781.505.2348
Fax:+1.781.505.2101
email:swiryaman at videoserver.com
http://www.videoserver.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Long [SMTP:Plong at SMITHMICRO.COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 1999 12:38 PM
> To: ITU-SG16 at mailbag.cps.intel.com
> Subject: e164 vs. partyNumber aliases
>
> What is the difference between an e164 alias and a partyNumber alias? Was
> e164
> found lacking, and does partyNumber now supercede it? Are we supposed to
> stop
> using e164? If not, how do we decide which form to use?
>
> Paul Long
> Smith Micro Software, Inc.
More information about the sg16-avd
mailing list