No root node
swiryaman at VIDEOSERVER.COM
Fri Sep 4 12:29:31 EDT 1998
I am not at all opposed to eliminating the root domain. A couple of
questions for Pete and the group:
1. Are you suggesting that at the national level the border elements
are fully meshed together, or alternatively arranged in a big ring as
Radhika is suggesting?
2. If so, when a new country "goes on-line" endpoints in the new
country would not be reachable until the information is propagated in this
fully meshed database (or inserted in the ring).
3. Same if, say France, had to switch its National H.323 Border Element
from Paris to Lyons for one week.
4. Are you open to the idea of a global clearing house to resolve the
address of border elements of countries which are currently not listed in
the fully-meshed database.
From: Pete Cordell [SMTP:pete.cordell at BT-SYS.BT.CO.UK]
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 1998 10:20 AM
To: ITU-SG16 at mailbag.cps.INTEL.COM
Subject: No root node
Apologies for not being on the last call, but...
I feel one really important issue with Santo's contribution is that
must remove the root domain. Having such a concept would give
politicians and lawyers far too much work!!! I believe the notes
put forward would allow the root node to be removed, and based on
comments I heard from Jim, I believe what he is proposing would
E-Mail: pete.cordell at bt-sys.bt.co.uk
Tel: +44 1473 646436
Fax: +44 1473 645499
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 3829 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the sg16-avd