amir at RADVISION.RAD.CO.IL
Wed Sep 2 03:51:49 EDT 1998
FYI - the IETF is just starting work on E.164 to IP address resolution -
the last IETF meeting covered this subject - and maybe someone on our
list is also active there and could help (or server as a contact
From: Roy, Radhika R, ALTEC [SMTP:rrroy at ATT.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 1998 8:38 PM
To: ITU-SG16 at mailbag.cps.intel.com
Subject: H.323 Addresses
We are discussing about H.323 addresing schemes in our bi-weekly
inter-GK conf calls.
The H.323 addresses that are being considered are 1. E.164, 2.
URL, and 4. TCP/UDP/RTP port addresses (and 5. aliases as well I
Although a hierarchical notion of addressing scehmes have been
have also recognized that some other variations of addressing
For example, people change their physical locations, but they
might have to
keep the same E.164 addresses. So, a translation is needed.
very physical relationship of E.164 addressing scheme (e.g.,
and NXXs, one can find the distance) has been broken.
Another example can be 800 numbers where the translation is also
In addition, from mobility point of view (device or person)
wireless?) environement may also be looked into.
As we go froward, we may consider many of those aspects as
pointed above to
provide solutions for the H.323 addressing schemes.
Radhika R. Roy
732 949 8657
rrroy at att.com
More information about the sg16-avd