H.225.0 Annex G conference call
Roy, Radhika R, ALTEC
rrroy at ATT.COM
Wed Aug 19 12:23:49 EDT 1998
Hi Everyone:
I have few comments on the revised Annex G writeup.
1. The title is OK
2. The scope is not OK. As we talked last time that the scope should be
extended to include the following:
* Inter-Gatekeeper Communications within a Domain
* Inter-Gatekeeper Communications Between (Administrative)
Domains
3. APC-1385 provides outlines for the "Inter-Gatekeeper Communications
within a Domain". The write-up of Annex G should be modified accordingly.
4. The items 2 and 3 had been discussed in the last conference call. Are we
going through a circle again?
5. The comments on the remaining text of the document will be reviewed when
the fundamental direction of Annex G is put along the line as pointed out
above.
Recent AT&T's proposed contribution has also been submitted to complement
the write-up in the area of "Inter-Gatekeeper Communications within a
Domain".
Thanks and regards,
Radhika R. Roy
AT&T
Tel: +1 732 949 8657
Email: rrroy at att.com
> ----------
> From: Glen Freundlich[SMTP:ggf at lucent.com]
> Reply To: ggf at lucent.com
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 1998 3:11 PM
> To: ITU-SG16 at MAILBAG.INTEL.COM
> Subject: H.225.0 Annex G conference call
>
> <<File: diff0201.zip>>
> There will be another conference call to discuss H.225.0 Annex G:
> date: 20 August (Thursday)
> time: 10:00am Mountain Time (9:00 Pacific, 12:00 Eastern, etc)
> bridge number: +1 630-224-4444
> code: 911202
> duration: 1 hour
>
> Tentative agenda:
> - next call 27 August
> - review of Santo Wiryaman's proposal
> - review of Pete Cordell's proposal
> - review of Radhika Roy's proposal
>
> Notes from last call:
> Most of the call was spent discussing an email from Radhika Roy. Some of
> the significant points are:
>
> - The Annex G title (Communication Between Administrative Domains) was
> viewed as too restrictive. According to the Yokosuka meeting report,
> Annex G is to focus on communication between administrative domains.
> While some folks seem to believe that the currently proposed protocol is
> suitable for both inter-gatekeeper communication and communication
> between administrative domains, others seem to believe that these are 2
> distinct problems.
>
> - Annex G should address inter-gatekeeper communication and
> communication between administrative domains separately.
>
> - The current direction of work does not seem to consider all possible
> architectures (hierarchical, distributed, hybrid), or at least the
> current Annex G does not adequately describe all possible architectures.
> In addition, no requirements appear to guide forming Annex G for each of
> these possible architectures.
>
> Mr. Roy has promised a proposal to address some of his concerns.
>
> Remember that this work will progress with proposals.
>
> For those who were on the last call, please correct me if I've missed
> something.
>
> Glen
>
>
> --
> Glen Freundlich ggf at lucent.com
> Lucent Technologies office: +1 303 538 2899
> 11900 N. Pecos fax: +1 303 538 3907
> Westminster, Colorado 80234 USA
>
More information about the sg16-avd
mailing list