APC-1336

Kiyoshi SAKAI sakai at FLAB.FUJITSU.CO.JP
Thu Apr 9 01:23:29 EDT 1998


Paul Long wrote:
> 6.1/H.225.0v2 says, "When messages are sent on the reliable H.245
> control channel, more than one message may be sent within the boundaries
> defined by the reliable transport PDU as long as whole messages are
> sent;" However, nothing is said about whether more than one _RAS_
> message may be sent "within the boundaries defined by the _un_reliable
> transport PDU as long as whole messages are sent." Are we allowed or
> prohibited from packing RAS messages, or is this just not addressed in
> the Recommendation?

Apparently this is not addressed in H.225.0, so I suppose there is the
possibility of interoperability problems with it. However, from talking
with Mr. Toga, it became obvious that there is really no need to pack
RAS messages, because they consume such a tiny amount of bandwidth.
Ammortizing packet overhead across the few messages that are exchanged
is just not worth the trouble.

--
Paul Long___________________________http://www.cmpu.net/public/plong
Smith Micro Software, Inc.__________http://www.smithmicro.com/



More information about the sg16-avd mailing list