Discard unexpected RTP packets?

Stephen Casner casner at PRECEPT.COM
Mon Sep 29 14:30:32 EDT 1997

On Mon, 29 Sep 1997, Henning Schulzrinne wrote:
> There is, in my opinion, no conceivable justification for ignoring the
> RTP PT and blindly accepting packets. That's probably why we didn't
> state the obvious.

I agree.

I expect the practice of ignoring the PT came about because the
capabilities negotiation allowed the use of only a single PT at a
time.  I hope that restriction will be removed.
                                                        -- Steve

More information about the sg16-avd mailing list