Discard unexpected RTP packets?
casner at PRECEPT.COM
Mon Sep 29 14:30:32 EDT 1997
On Mon, 29 Sep 1997, Henning Schulzrinne wrote:
> There is, in my opinion, no conceivable justification for ignoring the
> RTP PT and blindly accepting packets. That's probably why we didn't
> state the obvious.
I expect the practice of ignoring the PT came about because the
capabilities negotiation allowed the use of only a single PT at a
time. I hope that restriction will be removed.
More information about the sg16-avd