[h323plus] PTLIB_VER versioning
s.horne at spranto.com
Wed Apr 10 13:22:45 EDT 2013
The intent was always to have the switch < 10 and <= 10 change was only
recently added. I'm not exactly sure why .
I have reverted it back and added fix for that and PTLIB BUILD numbers 10 or
Let me know if something breaks.
From: h323plus-bounces at lists.packetizer.com
[mailto:h323plus-bounces at lists.packetizer.com] On Behalf Of Jan Willamowius
Sent: 11 April 2013 01:47
To: h323plus at lists.packetizer.com
Subject: Re: [h323plus] PTLIB_VER versioning
I don't think thats intended. Do you want to propose a change that is both
compatible with existing source code and doesn't require too wide spread
J.C Mercier wrote:
> Just a quick note, it seems that the expression below (PTLIB_MINOR <=
> 10) will always yield a least PTLIB_VER for the most part.
> for instance, if PTLIB_MAJOR =2, PTLIB_MINOR=10, it goes to the first
> #if, resulting in PTLIB_VER = 300 instead of 2100. Just curious to
> know if this is intentional.
> #if PTLIB_MAJOR == 2 && PTLIB_MINOR <= 10
> #define PTLIB_VER ( PTLIB_MAJOR*100 + PTLIB_MINOR*10 + PTLIB_BUILD
> ) #else
> #define PTLIB_VER ( PTLIB_MAJOR*1000 + PTLIB_MINOR*10 + PTLIB_BUILD
> ) #endif
Jan Willamowius, jan at willamowius.de, http://www.gnugk.org/
More information about the h323plus