[h323plus] Modifying Q.931 IEs in setup PDU
Paul Chitescu
paulc at voip.null.ro
Wed Feb 23 16:25:27 EST 2011
Hi, Jan!
Thanks for this change, it helps to be able to use unpatched libraries.
Paul
On Wednesday 23 February 2011 07:13:01 pm Jan Willamowius wrote:
> Paul,
>
> I absolutely agree that the application settings should not be
> overwritten after OnSendSignalSetup() and made the change in the
> H323Plus CVS.
>
> Regards,
> Jan
>
> Paul Chitescu wrote:
> > Hello all!
> >
> > While trying to add code in Yate to set some important parameters - for
> > the telephony business - I noticed my changes are overwritten by OpenH323
> > / H323Plus.
> >
> > I reimplemented H323Connection::OnSendSignalSetup() and changed the Q.931
> > fields in setupPDU. Unfortunately the following code (in h323.cxx) undoes
> > my changes:
> >
> >
> > if (!OnSendSignalSetup(setupPDU))
> > return EndedByNoAccept;
> >
> > // Do this again (was done when PDU was constructed) in case
> > // OnSendSignalSetup() changed something.
> > setupPDU.SetQ931Fields(*this, TRUE);
> > setupPDU.GetQ931().GetCalledPartyNumber(remotePartyNumber);
> >
> >
> >
> > Is there any solid reason why setupPDU.SetQ931Fields(*this, TRUE) is
> > called? Its default parameters are overwriting the type, plan,
> > presentation and screening of the numbers. I also need to set separate
> > type of number on caller and called party numbers.
> >
> > My plan is to patch OpenH323 / H323Plus to delete the extra
> > SetQ931Fields(). Do you see any unintended consequences of such a change?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Paul Chitescu
More information about the h323plus
mailing list