Rich,

SG8 is meeting this week, so hopefully we'll hear from them soon. We should be able to get things aligned in H.245 V6.

Glen

Rich Bowen wrote:

Mike,

In the Berlin meeting report, APC-1644a, it was noted that there was an inconsistency in the ASN.1 with respect to T.38. A liaison (TD-43a) was to be sent to SG 8 suggesting two possible solutions in H.245 v6, but no decision was indicated as to which of the two solutions would be used.

Do you know the current status of this issue? I noticed that neither of the suggested solutions appears in the white paper for H.245 v6.

Thanks, Rich

---

Richard K. Bowen Cisco Systems, Inc. rkbowen@cisco.com Research Triangle Park, NC

---

mike.nilsson@BT.COM wrote:

...

I have uploaded a draft of the White Paper for version 6 of H.245 to:

ftp://standard.pictel.com/avc-site/Incoming/h245wcmj.zip

Please send comments as soon as possible as this will have to be submitted to the ITU at the end of September.

Best regards

Mike Nilsson

---

• Mike Nilsson Tel: +44 1473 645413 *
• Applications Technology Group Fax: +44 1473 645011 *
• Internet and Multimedia Applications Email: mike.nilsson@bt.com *
• BT Advanced Communications Technology Centre [B54 Room 94] *
• Adastral Park *
• Martlesham Heath *
• Ipswich IP5 3RE *
• UK *

---

-- Glen Freundlich ggf@lucent.com Lucent Technologies office: +1 303 538 2899 11900 N. Pecos fax: +1 303 538 3907 Westminster, Colorado 80234 USA