Dear SG16 Experts,
This is a follow-up to Paul's posting. All the "H.325" related
contributions/documents are collected at the following place:
<http://ftp3.itu.ch/av-arch/avc-site/2005-2008/H325_requirements/>
<ftp://ftp3.itu.int/avc-site/2005-2008/H325_requirements/>
User ID: avguest, Password: Avguest (Note the uppercase 'A')
Its index page is:
0-h325req_index.html
0-h325req_index.xls
The first document h325req-000 collected "H.325" related records from
the meeting reports. Documents referred to therein have been numbered
sequentially from h325req-001 to h325req-048.
Best regards,
OKUBO Sakae
e-mail: okubo@aoni.waseda.jp
Visiting Professor
Global Information and Telecommunication Institute (GITI)
Waseda University
******************************************************************
Waseda University, YRP Ichibankan 312 Tel: +81 46 847 5406
3-4 Hikarinooka, Yokosuka-shi, Kanagawa-ken Fax: +81 46 847 5413
239-0847 Japan
H.323 videoconferencing: arranged by advice
******************************************************************
At 21:46 -0500 07/02/27, Paul E. Jones wrote:
Dear SG16 Experts,
Over the past year, we have held a few meetings to discuss the
development of a third-generation multimedia system (namely, H.325).
I have been encouraged by the number of people who have either
stated privately or publicly that, indeed, there is a need and point
to reasons why something new needs to be considered as a replacement
to the now 11 year old second-generation systems (H.323 and SIP).
At the same time, there have been some who have maintained the
position that we have already put a lot of investment into the
existing second-generation systems and ask why we should change.
Perhaps the simplest answer is that “technology never stops”. A
slow-down in research and development activities that aim to improve
the way that we communicate effectively means that little progress
will be made and we will not improve communication much beyond what
the state of the art is today. Innovation should never slow down
and, in fact, I do not think it will. However, innovating around
the architectures and “baggage” of the second-generation systems
is proving to be a challenge, in my opinion. The development,
management, and operation of second-generation systems are becoming
more expensive and, generally, only provide basic voice services are
provided to end users.
I am trying to collect all of the requirements that have been
submitted thus far in a single document that will not be considered
accepted or rejected, but will serve as a starting point for further
discussion and elaboration. Having read through some of the
material, I still believe that it is important to receive
contributions that speak to these areas:
Why is it important to consider development of a third-generation
multimedia system?
What are the business requirements that we need to consider as part
of such an effort?
What problems are we trying to solve?
What modes of communication would we like to enable that are simply
impossible or too costly due to constraints imposed by existing
systems?
Perhaps you can also think of other fundamental questions that are
still not answered or not answered sufficiently. In any case, we
have just a few days left before the document registration deadline,
so I would like to request that if you have some ideas to share,
please request a document number from Mr. Okubo and submit a
contribution. Even if your company is not a member of the ITU,
contributions are still welcome at this next meeting!
Cheers!
Paul