6.1/H.225.0v2 says, "When messages are sent on the reliable H.245 control channel, more than one message may be sent within the boundaries defined by the reliable transport PDU as long as whole messages are sent;" However, nothing is said about whether more than one _RAS_ message may be sent "within the boundaries defined by the _un_reliable transport PDU as long as whole messages are sent." Are we allowed or prohibited from packing RAS messages, or is this just not addressed in the Recommendation?
Paul Long Smith Micro
Paul Long wrote:
6.1/H.225.0v2 says, "When messages are sent on the reliable H.245 control channel, more than one message may be sent within the boundaries defined by the reliable transport PDU as long as whole messages are sent;" However, nothing is said about whether more than one _RAS_ message may be sent "within the boundaries defined by the _un_reliable transport PDU as long as whole messages are sent." Are we allowed or prohibited from packing RAS messages, or is this just not addressed in the Recommendation?
Apparently this is not addressed in H.225.0, so I suppose there is the possibility of interoperability problems with it. However, from talking with Mr. Toga, it became obvious that there is really no need to pack RAS messages, because they consume such a tiny amount of bandwidth. Ammortizing packet overhead across the few messages that are exchanged is just not worth the trouble.
-- Paul Long___________________________http://www.cmpu.net/public/plong Smith Micro Software, Inc.__________http://www.smithmicro.com/
participants (2)
-
Paul Long -
Paul Long