Hi, Audet:

Yes, I agree.

We should take the high level generic table (provided in the last meeting) as a starting point. Now we have to work around such that the parameters expressed in the table can be used to map over the lower network layer in a meaningful way to prove that it works to provide the backward compatibility as a minimum before we go any further.

This is definitely a test how good it is to satisfy the requirements.

Therefore, we should include "mapping" of the H.323 QOS to the lower network layer in the "scope."

Best regards, Radhika R. Roy AT&T

-----Original Message----- From: Francois Audet [SMTP:audet@NORTELNETWORKS.COM] Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 2:36 PM To: ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM Subject: Re: H.323 Annex N draft

In any case, we now have a baseline text. Contributions are welcomed for the next meeting.

...

-----Original Message----- From: Roy, Radhika R, ALARC [ mailto:rrroy@ATT.COM] Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 11:31 AM To: ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM Subject: Re: H.323 Annex N draft

Hi, Mike:

The fundamental issue is that we should be able to map the H.323 QOS over the lower network layer.