Hi, Steve and All:
I am enclosing the draft that Orit sends to us. Also, I guess that Joon will proceed for requesting BOF in the IETF for this work. Please send an email like Steve to all of us regarding the date, time, and agenda of the meeting.
I am also delighted to see Frank Audet's comments. Let all of us comment on the document.
Best regards, Radhika
<<H323-Internet_RADvision.doc>>
-----Original Message----- From: Stephen Terrill [SMTP:stephen.terrill@ericsson.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2000 6:30 AM To: Roy, Radhika R, ALARC Cc: Orit Levin; Tom-PT Taylor; martinze@cig.mot.com; ranga.dendi@wcom.com; joon_maeng@vtel.com; Francois Audet; Dave Walker; Paul E. Jones; schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu; bahman.mobasser@alcatel.fr; jo@teles.com Subject: Re: H.323-SIP Discussion
Hi Roy,
Hi Roy,
The 3/1 or 3/2 would be best, and the time is OK (17 - 19 C european time).
I would like to see the proposed agenda, and I would like to see that it coveres the latest in the IETF thoughts as well. I think that it is benificial if we can agree on the network scenarios which we are to concentrate on, and the service set.
Thanks,
..//Steve
"Roy, Radhika R, ALARC" wrote:
Hi, Orit and Joon:
I am glad that we got the views of Joon. We all had long conversations before, during, and after the SG16 meeting.
If needed, we may also arrange a conference call among ourselves.
Propose
time can be 11 AM - 1 PM EST USA and probable dates are 2/24, 3/1, 3/2, 3/3. I will arrange the conf bridge if we all agree to have a conf call.
Pl.
let me know.
Best regards, Radhika
-----Original Message----- From: Joon Maeng [SMTP:joon_maeng@vtel.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 5:13 PM To: 'Orit Levin'; Tom-PT Taylor; Roy, Radhika R, ALARC; martinze@cig.mot.com; ranga.dendi@wcom.com; Francois Audet; Dave Walker; Paul E. Jones Subject: RE: H.323-SIP Discussion
Hi Orit. You document seems to be a very good starting point. Before we start making any comments to your document, I'd like to see if we can
agree
on what we are going to work on. I am talking about defining the scope
based
on the requirements. I am sure my interest is different form others.
Can we
insert the scope section in you document and discuss what we are going
to
work on (in the first phase and so on..) before we get into details?
The
scope will help us in building the consensus quickly. Cheers. Regards, Joon
-----Original Message----- From: Roy, Radhika R, ALARC Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 5:00 PM To: 'Orit Levin'; Tom-PT Taylor; martinze@cig.mot.com; ranga.dendi@wcom.com; joon_maeng@vtel.com; Francois Audet; Dave
Walker;
Paul E. Jones; 'schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu'; 'bahman.mobasser@alcatel.fr'; 'stephen.terrill@ericsson.com'; 'jo@teles.com' Subject: RE: H.323-SIP Discussion
Hi, Orit:
You are just right on time. I appreciate this.
Please provide me couple of days (may be 2 more days). I would also
like
to include Henning S., Bahman M, Stephen T. and others in this mail.
My understanding is that you are willing to work as an editor of this
work
in the SG16.
Henning, just to let you know that SG16 has taken this as a work item.
Going forward, we would also like to take this issue to the IETF to
open a
work item there as well. Tom indicated that Scott B. likes to see that there is enough support for this work item in the IETF before he
considers
whether it is worthwhile to open a new WG or to be a part of another
WG.
Tom might elaborate on this.
I plan to attend the next IETF meeting in March'00. If we all plan to
go
there, we may push for this work in the IETF as well.
I would request that all of us provide comments on this. If needed, we
all
may be the co-author of this document to show that we have a wide
support
for this paper.
By the way, the next Q.13-14/16 Rapporteur meeting to be held in
OSAKA,
Japan (May 15-19) and any company can be the co-author of this
document
irrespective of the country of origin. Even Henning can also join in
this
contribution although Columbia University is not a member of the ITU-T because a Rap. can allow anyone to participate in the meeting.
Let us start this with a great cooperative mode.
Best regards, Radhika R. Roy AT&T +1 732 420 1580 rrroy@att.com
-----Original Message----- From: Orit Levin [SMTP:orit@radvision.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 4:17 PM To: Tom-PT Taylor; Roy, Radhika R, ALARC;martinze@cig.mot.com;
ranga.dendi@wcom.com; joon_maeng@vtel.com; Francois Audet; Dave
Walker;
Paul E. Jones Subject: H.323-SIP Discusssion
Hello all! I put together the ideas for H.323-Internet Interworkingdiscussion/work as the first follow up from Geneva meeting. Please,
look
into it, comment, provide ideas and additional topics of your
interest.
Feel free to forward it to whom I forgot... The only reason, I am NOT putting this on the SG16 mailing list, I wouldn't like to create waves outside H.323 community before we have an understanding on the agenda
in
general. After the first round of remarks, I would like to send it to
SG16
mailing list. Regards, Orit Levin RADVision Inc. 575 Corporate Drive Suite 420 Mahwah, NJ 07430 Tel: 1 201 529 4300 (230) Fax: 1 201 529 3516 www.radvision.com http://www.radvision.com orit@radvision.com mailto:orit@radvision.com << File: H323-Internet.zip >>
Some quick notes on the attached document:
- It's presumably SRV, not CRV, records you are talking about here.
- I agree that simplifying the current H.323 addressing "diversity" (to avoid using less flattering terms) would be the single most important item in simplifying interworking.
- The CPL authors are always open to suggestions on how to make the language less protocol-specific. Indeed, the next version will attempt to address some of these issues, but it's hard to do this without substantive input from the H.323 experts. The iptel mailing list is open to all. It would be preferable to have a single call processing language so that users can move services regardless of signaling protocol.
Regards,
Henning
participants (2)
-
Henning Schulzrinne -
Roy, Radhika R, ALARC