At 05:14 PM 3/9/99 -0500, you wrote:

I forwarded a note from David Oran to this list yesterday, presenting a number of arguments against placing H.245 with the MG function. I should have explained the significance of this message. If his arguments are not rebutted, Megaco will place a very low priority on protocol design to accommodate any "remoted H.245" arrangement.

Tom Taylor E-mail: taylor@nortelnetworks.com (internally Tom-PT Taylor) Tel.: +1 613 736 0961 (internally 396-1490) ***NOTE CHANGE*** FAX: same number

I trust my response was adequate.

In any case, we must continue to develop on this list H.GCP in such a way that it meets the needs of those interested in putting H.245 in GWs.

Dale Skran