Hi,

I think existing Annex - I in H.245 is written much before RFC3267 is written and hence it out of sync in content.

The RTP format mentioned in Annex - I is different from what is mentioned in RFC3267.

Even if we want to incorporate this material in existing Annex - I, it will be like replacing the entire Annex - I content with the new content..

Thanks Venkata

At 07:50 PM 1/25/2005 -0500, Dave Lindbergh wrote:

Is there a reason why this needs to be a separate Annex to H.245? I'd prefer to incorporate this material into an existing Annex, just to

reduce

the amount of clutter in H.245.

--Dave

At 05:32 PM 1/24/2005, Venkata Nanduri wrote:

...

Dear SG16 experts,

I would like the attached proposal to be submitted to next meeting of SG16 group to be held at Melbourne in February last week, 2005.

Before I submit the proposal formally, I would like to get some early feedback on the proposal from experts in the group.

Can you please review the document and let me know your comments?

Thanks Venkata

---

Dave Lindbergh Polycom, Inc. 100 Minuteman Road Andover MA 01810 USA Voice: +1 978 292 5366 Email: lindbergh@92F1.com H.320, H.323 video by arrangement