Radhika,

Yes, it was determined.

Paul

----- Original Message ----- From: "Roy, Radhika R, ALARC" rrroy@ATT.COM To: ITU-SG16@mailbag.cps.intel.com Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 3:47 PM Subject: Re: H.323 Annex D

Hi, Everyone:

In addition to Frank Audet's comments, I like to know whether H.323 Annex

D

was determined in the last SG16 meeting [I do not see it in the table,

p27,

TD-74 (plen)].

Thanks, Radhika R. Roy AT&T

...

-----Original Message----- From: Francois Audet [SMTP:audet@NORTELNETWORKS.COM] Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 1:56 PM To: ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM Subject: H.323 Annex D

Hi,

I'm not sure who is editor of H.323 Annex D, but...

It seems that there is no reference in Annex D of what version of H.323 and H.245 is required for the procedures to work. There is no way to indicate T.38 or even support of UDP vs. TCP transport in H.245v2.

I think the answer is that H.245v4 or later is required. Perhaps

somebody

...

can clarify if this is correct.

In any case, we definitively need to specify in H.323 Annex D which version of H.245 is required...

---

François Audet Tel:+1 408 565 5675 mailto:audet@NortelNetworks.com Nortel Networks Fax:+1 408 565 2375 http://www.NortelNetworks.com http://www.nortelnetworks.com/