H.248 Annex M Debate
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a740/3a740369d7a9a5164a82771306bb290717a5f19e" alt=""
A private debate has been taking place (between David Cromwell and Markus Pauls) over whether H.248 Annex M should be restored to a structure which optimizes the operation with the IN. Should that debate be broadened to this list or to the Megaco list? Tom Taylor Multimedia Control and Applications Standards Ph. +1 613 736 0961 Cell +1 613 290 0844 taylor@nortelnetworks.com
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3df81/3df816e9eac7b1585b3cf6f4169405f481c3aaa1" alt=""
G'Day Tom, Probably the ITU if the IN people are involved. The IETF may like initially to be drop copied with a note saying that the discussion is on the sg16 list. Cheers, Christian Tom-PT Taylor wrote:
A private debate has been taking place (between David Cromwell and Markus Pauls) over whether H.248 Annex M should be restored to a structure which optimizes the operation with the IN. Should that debate be broadened to this list or to the Megaco list?
Tom Taylor Multimedia Control and Applications Standards Ph. +1 613 736 0961 Cell +1 613 290 0844 taylor@nortelnetworks.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to listserv@mailbag.intel.com
participants (2)
-
Christian Groves
-
Tom-PT Taylor