Dear Noah,

[1]Do you plan to attend this meetin! g? [2]If you answer “Yes”to[1], then do you plan to submit some technical contributions?How many?

Yes (either in person or by remote conferencing.)

3 = two edited version of on-going recommedation drafts (H.IDscheme + H.ID-RA) and possibly another technical note for trying to resolve the misunderstanding related to H.IDscheme, which came to light in the LS contribution from Mr. Craig Harmon (SC31/WG6 Convener) to the last IoT-GSI week in November.

Thank you in advance for your attention.

Sincerely, Chiaki Ishikawa

On (2011年12月26日 15:06), LuoZhong wrote:

Dear All

This mail is intended as a reminder or preliminary meeting notice for the meeting.

Previously, I sent out a meeting notice which looked like a formal meeting notice. I am sorry since it is not procedurally completely correct.

I indeed wanted to combine several procedural steps together, but I realized it is not a good practice.

So, I start from the beginning.(But of course, the information I put in the formal meeting notice is based on our previous communications with many experts).

By sending this mail to you, Mr.Jeong and I, as WP2 co-chairs, request you to kindly feedback the following information as soon as possible(Ideally no later than 4^th January 2012):

[1]Do you plan to attend this meetin! g? [2]If you answer “Yes”to[1], then do you plan to submit some technical contributions?How many?

With this information gathered and summed up, we can decide if there are sufficient degree of participation for this meeting to justify our request for SG16 chair’s formal approval of the meeting.

Thanks a lot!

Best Regards

Noah