Re: H.323v3 for decision in September
One issue I was discussing with my BT colleagues was installing an open framework for extensibility and feature negotiation into H.323v3. The motivation for this was to enable transport of SS7, but also other protocols such as DPNSS, (is CAS a digital one?) and so on. If we were to go ahead I guess we would have presented something in Berlin.
Given that September is fast approaching waiting for such a scheme to transport things like SS7 does not seem too onerous.
Unfortunately my colleagues are out this week, but I will attach the latest text so that people can have early sight of it.
Regards,
Pete
============================================= Pete Cordell pete@tech-know-ware.com =============================================
-----Original Message----- From: Paul E. Jones paul.jones@TIES.ITU.INT To: ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM Date: 29 June 1999 01:25 Subject: H.323v3 for decision in September
Folks,
We may attempt to decide H.323v3 in September and determine version 4 in February. Mr. Skran has asked that I post the current draft so that people can review the document. This document must be delivered to the ITU by 30 June 1999. (Please note that Annex C/H.323 is also a candidate for
decision
in Septemer.)
This document contains only minor editorial changes to the document that
was
determined in Santiago. Nonetheless, I encourage you to review the
document
for any errors or omissions.
The change marks indicate all changes that have been made since version 2.
Please direct any comments on the document to me.
The document can be found here:
ftp://standards.pictel.com/avc-site/Incoming/H.323v3-990628.doc
Best Regards, Paul E. Jones DataBeam Corporation
Pete,
I would venture to say that, given the nature of this work, it would not be included in H.323v3. However, it could certainly be included in H.323v4, which, as I noted below, will be determined in February.
There are actually a number of new features people want to add to H.323, which is one reason for adjusting the schedule. By deciding v3 in September, we can focus our attention on v4, which will give us the time to enrich H.323 in a reasonable timeframe. It would be nearly impossible to properly add all of the new features to v3 between now and February.
Would you be willing to bring that document as a contribution toward v4?
Paul
----- Original Message ----- From: Pete Cordell pete@TECH-KNOW-WARE.COM To: ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 1999 4:01 AM Subject: Re: H.323v3 for decision in September
One issue I was discussing with my BT colleagues was installing an open framework for extensibility and feature negotiation into H.323v3. The motivation for this was to enable transport of SS7, but also other
protocols
such as DPNSS, (is CAS a digital one?) and so on. If we were to go ahead
I
guess we would have presented something in Berlin.
Given that September is fast approaching waiting for such a scheme to transport things like SS7 does not seem too onerous.
Unfortunately my colleagues are out this week, but I will attach the
latest
text so that people can have early sight of it.
Regards,
Pete
============================================= Pete Cordell pete@tech-know-ware.com =============================================
-----Original Message----- From: Paul E. Jones paul.jones@TIES.ITU.INT To: ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM Date: 29 June 1999 01:25 Subject: H.323v3 for decision in September
Folks,
We may attempt to decide H.323v3 in September and determine version 4 in February. Mr. Skran has asked that I post the current draft so that
people
can review the document. This document must be delivered to the ITU by
30
June 1999. (Please note that Annex C/H.323 is also a candidate for
decision
in Septemer.)
This document contains only minor editorial changes to the document that
was
determined in Santiago. Nonetheless, I encourage you to review the
document
for any errors or omissions.
The change marks indicate all changes that have been made since version
2.
Please direct any comments on the document to me.
The document can be found here:
ftp://standards.pictel.com/avc-site/Incoming/H.323v3-990628.doc
Best Regards, Paul E. Jones DataBeam Corporation
participants (2)
-
Paul E. Jones -
Pete Cordell