Re: H.245 ReplacementFor Appendix

Mike, Hussein, (and all), Thanks for your comments on the ReplacmentFor text. I'm trying to wrap up a revised contribuiton for SunRiver this week. I would appreciate your thoughts on the following: At 02:44 PM 8/14/97 +0100, nilsson_m_e@bt-web.bt.co.uk wrote:
I propose to not mention this issue in the ReplacementFor text, since I think it is a generic issue with RSVP support and has nothing to do with ReplacementFor in particular. We can modify the appendix example text in SunRiver (or even after) based on however the group decides to handle this.
No, this is not intended to be allowed. It's purely for a one-time mode switch.
No this should not be allowed. I'll clarify both the example appendix and the proposed normative semantics for H.245 on this point.
I'll propose some text along the lines you suggest. (That we do not want to allow this.) ------------------------------------------------------------------- Dave Lindbergh Email: lindbergh@pictel.com Manager, Technical Standards Group Voice: +1 508 623 4351 PictureTel Corporation Fax: +1 508 749 2804 100 Minuteman Road - M/S 635 H.320: +1 508 437 0265 (twice) Andover MA 01810 USA http://standards.pictel.com PGP fingerprint: C8 3E 28 69 53 0A 4B 87 EF E0 11 CD AC 87 4D CD -------------------------------------------------------------------
participants (1)
-
Dave Lindbergh