Re: Conflicting text in H.323 concerning the requirement for esta blishing a H.245 control channel??

which defeats the whole point of having a Fast Connect procedure (FS + H.245). Why isn't in-band- DTMF transfer used instead (in FS)? -Charles
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to listserv@mailbag.intel.com

Charles, It does NOT defeat ANY of the stated aims of FastConnect. These aims were to get agreed media channels in both directions open as quickly as possible. Doing FastStart AND H.245 gives you your media quickly, and means you have the power of H.245 thereon. In-band DTMF transfer may be used. If you happen to be using a codec that supports it. If you assume it when you're using an unsuitable codec you'll have a problem. Which is a reason for using H.245 capability negotiation. Regards, Chris Agboh, Charles wrote:
-- Dr Chris Purvis -- Development Manager ISDN Communications Ltd, The Stable Block, Ronans, Chavey Down Road Winkfield Row, Berkshire. RG42 6LY ENGLAND Phone: +44 1344 899 007 Fax: +44 1344 899 001 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to listserv@mailbag.intel.com
participants (2)
-
Agboh, Charles
-
Chris Wayman Purvis