Re: Reference which version of Q.931, etc.?

Rich, I guess that I misunderstood what you were saying. I agree that your proposed solution is the only practical one at this time. As to Q.932, etc. I think that it would be best to keep all references to the versions in v2 for the same reason as for Q.931. Bob ------------------------------------------------------------------ Robert Callaghan Siemens Enterprise Networks Tel: +1.561.923.1756 Fax: +1.561.923.1403 Email: Robert.Callaghan@ICN.Siemens.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ -----Original Message----- From: Rich Bowen [mailto:rkbowen@CISCO.COM] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 11:07 PM To: ITU-SG16@mailbag.cps.intel.com Subject: Re: Reference which version of Q.931, etc.? Hi Bob, I just want to remind everyone that we agreed in Osaka not to update the Q.931 cross-references, but instead to revert the parent reference to Q.931 (1993) so we (I) wouldn't have to update and verify all of the table references, etc. However, when I was about to make that change, I noticed that there were references to 1998 versions of other standards (Q.932, Q.850) also, and I was concerned that these other standards might reference the 1998 version of Q.931, so we would have a synchronization problem of another kind. That's why I didn't make the change, and noted this as an open issue. I also have some concern about referencing a standard that is no longer published. My preference would be to leave the parent reference as Q.931 (1998) and update the semi-infinite number of cross-references. I agree the inconsistency has to be corrected. BTW, this also existed in v2. - Rich "Callaghan, Robert" wrote:
changes
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Richard K. Bowen Cisco Systems, Inc. VoIP Session Protocols Research Triangle Park, NC, USA -------------------------------------------------------------------- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to listserv@mailbag.intel.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to listserv@mailbag.intel.com
participants (1)
-
Callaghan, Robert