Dear Mr. Aronson,
since the last meeting in Portland there is a discussion concerning Annex I,
unfortunately we haven't heard your opinion as an expert on this area. What do you think about the discussed technical topics as well as the provided test conditions ? Can you please comment on that ?
Thank you very much. Best wishes Gero Baese
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to listserv@mailbag.intel.com
Mr. Gero,
At 04:08 PM 10/24/00 +0200, Baese Gero wrote:
Dear Mr. Aronson,
since the last meeting in Portland there is a discussion concerning Annex I,
unfortunately we haven't heard your opinion as an expert on this area. What do you think about the discussed technical topics as well as the
I don't want to weigh-in with an opinion on the technical topics, other than that I am impressed with how deeply this is being worked.
provided test conditions ? Can you please comment on that ?
As for the test conditions, I think they will work. I could see other possibilities, but there would be some political issues there.
Thank you very much. Best wishes Gero Baese
For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to listserv@mailbag.intel.com
I would also like to know:
1) Is there some way to quantify the relative complexities of each proposal?
2) What is the status of this work in the IETF?
3) Are there any IPR issues with either proposal?
Barry Aronson
Barry Aronson Toshiba Corporation 33 Lake Shore Ave. Beverly, MA 01915-1907 USA
E-mail: baronson@ieee.org Voice: +1 978-232-3994 Fax: +1 978-232-9220 Mobile: +1 978-902-0768 Video: H.320, H.323, and H.324
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to listserv@mailbag.intel.com
participants (2)
-
Baese Gero
-
Barry Aronson