Re: FW: [VoIP-list] FW: [Fwd: AVT WG last call on RTP spec and pr ofil e]
I think that they just need people sending them emails saying "Company X demonstrated G.723.1 interoperability with Company Y". Some people have started to send those to Stephen Casner [casner@acm.org]. He's looking for people who implemented the early version of H.263-1996 and GSM-HR and GSM-EFR. If you do, respond, because they will remove the payload type... -----Original Message----- From: Rex Coldren [mailto:coldrenr@agcs.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 11:37 AM To: Audet, Francois [SC2:4K02:EXCH] Cc: ITU-SG16@mailbag.cps.INTEL.COM Subject: Re: FW: [VoIP-list] FW: [Fwd: AVT WG last call on RTP spec and profil e] Francois, I believe you are correct. However, I am not familiar with how the IETF determines "interoperable implementations". Is is simply a matter of vendors reporting with whom they interoperate or is there some IETF-sponsored interop event that needs to be attended? Rex Francois Audet wrote: Guys,This payload type = 4 for G.723.1 has been in H.225.0 for many years. Don't we have many interoperable H.323 products using PT=4 for G.723?Won't it be a major interoperability problem if this payload type is removed from the A/V specification?????> -----Original Message-----
participants (1)
-
Francois Audet