RE: H.323-SIP Discussion

24 Feb 2000


      I second what Bahman said.  It should be H.323-SIP or SIP-H.323
Interworking.  Cheers.
Regards,
Joon
...
-----Original Message-----
From:	Bahman Mobasser [mailto:bahman@bahman.org]
Sent:	Wednesday, February 23, 2000 10:50 PM
To:	Orit Levin; Tom-PT Taylor; martinze@cig.mot.com; 
ranga.dendi@wcom.com; joon_maeng@vtel.com; Francois Audet; 
Dave Walker; Paul E. Jones; Henning Schulzrinne; Roy, Radhika 
R, ALARC; Stephen Terrill; bahman.mobasser@alcatel.fr; 
jo@teles.com; Joerg Ott
Subject:	RE: H.323-SIP Discussion
I find the title H.323-Internet a bit disconcerting. Wasn't 
H.323 usable on Internet up to now? The title seems to 
suggest H.323 on Internet is something new!
I know it is just a title, but I prefer simply H.323-SIP.
Bahman

Bahman Mobasser                   Tel: +33 1 30771608
Alcatel                        Mobile: +33 6 12091822
10 rue Latécoère                  Fax: +33 1 30779914
78140 Vélizy        Voice & Fax Mail: +33 1 5301 0789
France               Roaming email: Bahman@Bahman.org

<< OLE Object: Ensemble OLE >>
> -----Original Message-----
    > From:	Orit Levin [mailto:orit@radvision.com]
    > Sent:	jeudi 24 février 2000 01:51
    > To:	Tom-PT Taylor; martinze@cig.mot.com; 
    > ranga.dendi@wcom.com; joon_maeng@vtel.com; Francois Audet; 
    > Dave Walker; Paul E. Jones; Henning Schulzrinne; Roy, Radhika 
    > R, ALARC; Stephen Terrill; bahman.mobasser@alcatel.fr; 
    > jo@teles.com; Joerg Ott
    > Subject:	Re: H.323-SIP Discussion
    > 
    > Hello all!
    > I enjoyed to see a positive discussion this morning.
    > Therefore I would like to move the topic to the SG-16 mailing list
and
    > indicate it by [H.323-Internet] topic.
    > François, any ideas for an alternative name? "SIP" is 
    > limiting, "IETF" is
    > political...
    > 
    > Joon, I think that a "scope" chapter is a good idea. I 
    > completely agree that
    > before diving into details of our contributions, we have to 
    > formulate this
    > part. On the other hand, I see it as an output of our initial 
    > discussion,
    > rather then its starting point. If you already have in mind 
    > some specifics
    > on the scope chapter, go ahead and put them on the (mailing)
paper.
    > 
    > In regards to starting a formal joined work with IETF and 
    > pushing for a
    > working group.  It is a sensitive issue (Are we in agreement on
that?)
    > Everybody (as a company and as an individual) is free to 
    > join, initiate or
    > participate in various standards bodies and pursue their goals.
These
    > initiatives can be helpful for our work as well. I wouldn't 
    > start our ITU
    > work from formal definition of relationships with other 
    > standards bodies. As
    > we can see from Henning's mail, the good will from all of us 
    > is a great
    > starting point!
    > I am afraid that not all of us will go to Australia. My 
    > company (as many
    > others) will have representatives in SIP, Megaco and other 
    > relevant working
    > groups.  Nevertheless lets start the official H.323-Internet 
    > work at ITU.
    > I hope to see more specific topics of interest and "a will" 
    > to address them
    > in contributions for Osaka meeting. I will incorporate 
    > François' additions.
    > Stephen, could you list IETF latest topics, list of services 
    > and level of
    > scenarios that you would like to consider as a part of this work.
    >  I wouldn't like to address the same things as TIPHON and 
    > IETF do. They are
    > doing very well and we may help them if needed. All of us 
    > have different
    > interests, but my personal opinion is that
    > - providing end user with end-to-end basic++ connectivity
    > - enhancing H.323 by using IETF technologies (which 
    > definitely helps the
    > first one)
    > - finding common areas of interest among the companies
    > are the criteria for defining our work items.
    > BTW: Conference call is good, but lets do some work at home and on
the
    > mailing list before we have an agenda to discuss.
    > Best Regards,
    > Orit Levin
    > RADVision Inc.
    > 575 Corporate Drive Suite 420
    > Mahwah, NJ 07430
    > Tel: 1 201 529 4300  (230)
    > Fax: 1 201 529 3516
    > www.radvision.com
    > orit@radvision.com

Joon Maeng

tags (0)

participants (1)