Re: [H.323-SIP/Internet] The reason.
FYI - I asked the IETF area directors to give me a guidance on requesting a BOF. I have not heard anything yet. I'll keep you posted. Regards, Joon
-----Original Message----- From: Roy, Radhika R, ALARC [mailto:rrroy@att.com] Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 5:02 PM To: ITU-SG16@mailbag.cps.intel.com Subject: Re: [H.323-SIP/Internet] The reason.
Hi, Everyone:
Both Dave and Joon made good points. In addition to the upcoming SG16 Rap. meeting, I would assume that Joon, Dave, and others will also be willing to work for the BOF in the upcoming IETF meeting (March'00).
We have to focus in both organizations: IETF and SG16. Once we show our interest, the rest will be fine.
The most important point is that we have start our work: SIP-H.323 Interworking Standard.
Best regards, Radhika R. Roy AT&T
-----Original Message----- From: Dave Walker [SMTP:drwalker@ss8networks.com] Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 5:35 PM To: ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM Subject: Re: [H.323-SIP/Internet] The reason.
It depends what the outcome of the work is. The first step
must be to
define what our goals are. I don't want to pre-judge what
the outcome
is going to be until I know what we're actually trying to achieve.
One possible eventual outcome could be an H.246 type document that provides a message by message, field by field mapping
between H.323 and
SIP, or we might only define a high level profile that states which procedures an implementation should and should not use in
order to ensure
interworking (e.g. "H.323 endpoints shall use fast
connect"). So it's
not clear that we're going to need an ITU recommendation,
possibly a BCP
RFC or some ITU equivalent might suffice. If the SIP and/or H.323 specifications need to be changed to address our interworking goals, it's again not clear that new standards are needed, both
SIP and H.323
can tweaked if needed. If its determined that one or both of the protocols needs a major overhaul in order to support
interworking, then
it's probably a sign that the goals for interworking
weren't appropriate.
What we need to do is to ensure that all interested parties
are able to
participate fully in the discussions. That kind of open
process is the
norm in the IETF. I'd be unhappy to see a situation where I had to spend thousands of dollars to join a consortium just to access a few drafts or subscribe to a mailing list.
The argument is often made that the ITU has the H.323
experts and the IETF
has the SIP experts, but in fact the overlap of these
experts is probably
larger than they'd care to admit. Despite what is written
in the meeting
report, there is enough interest in SG16 to keep the work
moving there.
There is obviously interest in the IETF as well.
I agree with the proposal that a BOF be held at the next IETF where interested experts can attempt to resolve the scope of the
work and gauge
the IETF's interest in owning it. Due to the reluctance shown by SG management in the recent SG16 meeting, the door certainly
seems open to
allowing the IETF ownership. Input to the BOF should at least be an I-D based on the document written by RadVision, as well as the Singh/Schulzrinne draft.
Dave Walker SS8 Networks Ottawa Canada
-----Original Message----- From: Mailing list for parties associated with ITU-T Study Group 16 [mailto:ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM]On Behalf Of Joon Maeng Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 3:35 PM To: ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM Subject: Re: [H.323-SIP/Internet] The reason.
I would propose that it should be a combined work with
IETF. Ideally we
should get ITU recommendation number and ITU RFC number for the same document when it is complete. If you look at SIP-H.323
interworking,
there are certain components that have to be standardized. (We
will need more
than interworking guidelines.) Regards, Joon
-----Original Message----- From: Roy, Radhika R, ALARC [mailto:rrroy@att.com] Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 10:46 AM To: ITU-SG16@mailbag.cps.intel.com Subject: Re: [H.323-SIP/Internet] The reason.
Hi, Everyone:
We are all aware that many works related to H.323-SIP Interworking works are being proposed including IMTC and TIPHON. I am also in
touch with Ayse
Dilber of AT&T. These organizations are primarily chartered for interoperability agreements, testing, etc. and do NOT create standards per se. Like TIPHON, they are willing to send a liaison to
the ITU-T SG16
recommending the requirements.
In the same fashion, TIPHON and IMTC are also working for H.323 mobility works. That does not mean that the SG16 should not do the H.323 mobility work.
The H.323 and SIP standards are created by the ITU-T and IETF, respectively and these standards organizations are the right bodies to
create the
standards that are recognized internationally.
I am again quoting from decision taken in the last SG16
meeting TD-74
(Plen), Section 3.8.5.1, p-48:
"... Invite contributions on how to approach the work. Need to get scenarios for progressing work in a controlled architectural approach. Ms. Levin has volunteered to draft a framework. ..."
We are proceeding to work along this line in the SG16.
Best Regards, Radhika R. Roy AT&T +1 732 420 1580 rrroy@att.com
-----Original Message----- From: Sebestyen Istvan ICN M CS 27
[SMTP:Istvan.Sebestyen@ICN.SIEMENS.DE]
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 9:27 AM To: ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM Subject: Re: [H.323-SIP/Internet] The reason. Importance: High
Dear Colleagues, I was present at the SG16 meeting, and have also read now
carefully the
meeting report. There is really at this point in time in
the ITU no new
"workitem" or "question" open for this work. Certainly this
might change
if based on contributions SG16 decides so.
You might, however, be interested that in the IMTC a lot of
very similar
work is already being done. Have a view of the program of the aHIT! Working Group
(chaired by Ayse
Dilber (adilber@att.com)) of AT&T), described below. I am sure Ayse will be more than happy to see more
active co-workers
pushing the work of aHIT! ahead. The aHIT! program was approved
within the IMTC in
November 1999, and now it is running full speed.
Kind regards, Istvan sebestyen
aHIT! AG's Objectives:
- Identify VoIP and Multimedia Applications (i.e., VoIP, FoIP,
Conferencing, Instant Messaging, etc.) which will enable service
providers to implement
end-to-end services;
- Identify Interworking Scenarios (i.e., between H.323 and
SIP/H.248-MEGACO/cable/etc.) to achieve interworking
between different
protocols to support multi-vendor and multi-service
provider environments;
- Develop technical interoperability documents per
application and per
scenario to guide service providers and vendors to
implement seamless,
secure, global VoIP and Multimedia Applications;
- Encourage, define and participate in global VoIP and
Multimedia
applications trials between member service providers and vendors
- Provide a forum for open technical exchange;
- Support, promote and participate in IMTC/ETSI testing events.
aHIT! AG Work Plan:
- Define technical lower layer communications capabilities
and protocols
for each application. 2) Work on interworking between H.323 and SIP/NCS/H.248-MEGACO. 3) Introduce the value-added functionalities and
enhanced services.
- Develop and publish technical interoperability documents per
application/scenario starting from 2Q00.
aHIT! AG will address the following issues for each
application,:
Performance/QoS Reliability Naming/Numbering/Addressing Settlements/Billing Fax Support OAM&P Support Number Portability Interworking Issues(i.e.,H.323/SIP/MEGACO/NCS and CCS/PSTN) Enhanced Services (i.e., roaming)
Dr. Istvan Sebestyen Siemens AG, ICN M CS27, Hofmannstr. 51 D-81359 Munich Tel:+49-89-722-47230 Fax:+49-89-722-47713 E-Mail office: istvan.sebestyen@icn.siemens.de;
istvan@sebestyen.de
E-mail private: istvan_sebestyen@yahoo.com; Siemens
Intranet:http://netinfo.icn.siemens.de/es/team/essp/team/essp4
Siemens FTP: ftp://mchhpn006a.mch.pn.siemens.de
--
From: Roy, Radhika R, ALARC[SMTP:rrroy@ATT.COM] Reply To: Mailing list for parties associated with
ITU-T Study Group
16 Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 1:58 PM To: ITU-SG16@mailbag.cps.intel.com Subject: Re: [H.323-SIP/Internet] The reason.
Hi, Everyone:
I am in full agreement with Orit. I guess that this has
also been the
case
for many people who had been present in the SG16 meeting.
More importantly, when I talked to Glen, he clearly
indicated that we
should bring contributions to get the work started. The
interworking between
H.323 and SIP may belong Q.14 (although it has to be discussed
jointly with
Q.13
and Q.14).
There has been a very strong interest for the work of
H.323-SIP
Interworking. A large number of people throughout the
world (starting
from
the ITU-T and IETF) is contacting me.
The primary goal of the standard bodies is to provide
"INTEROPERABILITY."
Best regards, Radhika R. Roy AT&T +1 732 420 1580 rrroy@att.com
participants (1)
-
Joon Maeng